Field research is defined as, Direct Observation, Participant Observation and Qualitative Interviews. DO involves the initial approach to understanding a setting (context), PO involves recording the details of social life in a setting (ethnographical), QI involves informal/conversational, semi-structured, standardised/open-ended approaches. (www.researchconnections.org)
Here, I will be discussing the field work of Loraine Leeson and Gavin Renwick whilst relating particular concepts to my own practice.
In chapter 6 of Art, Process, Change: Inside a Socially Situated Practice (2017), Loraine Leeson discusses how addressing the ‘need’ for artistic activity is pertinent in enabling both artist, collaborator(s) and participants to work together to realise the project, ‘it enables the artistic activity to become part of a movement towards change rather than standing outside of it.’ Leeson goes on to describe the various ways need might be expressed within a community, focusing on the negotiation aspect and asking the right questions which ‘remain central to the building of any collaborative project’.
Gavin Renwick in the article Artistic Research and Fieldwork as Social Practice (2008) describes how he was invited into a community as a visitor not as a researcher. The people he planned to work with laid down the rules, they wanted to know if he was the right person to work with them. According to Miwon Kwon in One Place After Another (2004), ‘the objectives and identity of a coherent community are seen as determined by its members before any encounter with outside individuals or groups, including community artists’. In my work on Broadwater Farm estate, I have taken an embedded approach to developing projects by attending community meetings and developing conversations with residents and community leaders over a period of time. Renwick suggests ‘willingness to follow one’s own nose is quite important as opposed to sticking to a concept’. I would agree that research and work in situated practices, requires an openness to any change in direction.
Lesson develops the idea of negotiation as ‘this conscious sharing and meeting of needs that forms the backbone of the negotiating process, together with respect for the different positions of others’. My project has developed this year to include collaboration with a poet/ spoken word artist, during our process of working together we have negotiated our roles so that both of us feel we are supporting each other in getting what we need. Leeson advocates ‘when a person is getting what they need from a process, they give off their best’. We have also been clear with resident participants in the project what their role is too. Kwon (2004) suggests the identities of those involved ‘are in the process of continuous negotiation’. Renwick discovered that the community and its project collaborators ‘needed to define their idea of habitat on our terms to facilitate the negotiations process’.
The quality of listening and responding is as important as asking the questions according to Leeson as it ‘enables the hopes and desires of each to become embedded in the project’. Dialogue with potential collaborators and participants helps to develop the artist’s intentions, ‘it is only through the collective needs being properly fulfilled that it is possible to realise one’s own.’ Renwick describes how the First Nation community wanted him to ‘explore their notion of home and articulate it in a Western way.’ Similarly my work has explored notions of home in the context of a housing estate which is under threat of redevelopment. During the conversations between collaborators and participants, residents personal stories inform the work of the artists, which create a framework thus ‘the process of listening turns into the structuring that will enable the production of the artwork’ (Leeson 2008).
Renwick discusses how he uses art and research methodologies in relation to what is appropriate at the time, ‘there is one section that is entirely visual which would be “through art”, it utilises and works with the potential of visual narrative and communication’. He is more concerned with research through art as a method. Leeson states how forms of narrative run through traditional frescoes by Giotto and her own work. She describes how those who interact ‘become actively engaged in customising their ‘journey’, in making their own sense of the narrative, which they create or navigate for themselves’.
Another important factor which Leeson refers to in her work is communication in relation to the difficulties which can arise when working collaboratively. ‘Issues can also arise in collaborative projects where there is dependence on a collaborative partner for their skills and knowledge.’ My work with the poet involves this reliance and we have to support each other through the process so that the project continues to feel alive and well. Lesson comments on difficulties which arise out of ‘lack of clarity in roles and responsibilities’ and how it is important ‘to keep communication open and positive’.
In terms of outcomes, Leeson suggests ‘in some projects the activity is the totality of the work, however where there is ‘product’, this can also be seen as part of the continuum’. For Renwick, the outcome was ‘research: communicable, transferable knowledge, with part of the outcome being art/practice’. For Leeson there can be multiple outcomes relating to the needs of those involved ranging from engagement in an activity or participation in an event to shared ownership in the final work, ‘how each participant, partner, teacher or participating artist feels about their involvement also matters’.
To conclude, fieldwork as social practice can be understood in terms of need, collaboration, participation, negotiation, dialogue, framework, communication, making, narrative, engagement, process and outcome. Renwick prefers to place his practice in the context in which ‘the very act of planning a community can be a revolutionary act’. Leeson succinctly describes the role of art ‘as an intrinsic part of social engagement’ she continues to say ‘its processes are fluid’ and recommends ‘it is better for institutions to support and learn rather than assume greater knowledge.’


Boxer Rebellion
Irony of a Negro Policeman
Crowns (Peso Neto) 1981



Ándre Kertész: Ernest. Paris 1931
Fran Cottell
Wenling, China